SWRA825 January   2025 IWR6843 , LP87745-Q1

 

  1.   1
  2.   Abstract
  3.   Trademarks
  4. 1Introduction
    1. 1.1 Regulatory Needs for Electro-Sensitive Protective Equipment (ESPE)
    2. 1.2 Different Types of Electro-Sensitive Protective Equipment (ESPE)
  5. 2Advantages of Radar Sensors in Industrial Applications
  6. 3Safety Concept Evaluation/Analysis
    1. 3.1 System Requirements
      1. 3.1.1 Stationary Use Case
      2. 3.1.2 Mobile Use Case
    2. 3.2 Considerations for Sensing Architectures
      1. 3.2.1 System Level Architecture
        1. 3.2.1.1 Bi-Static With Spatial Diversity
        2. 3.2.1.2 Co-Located Bi-Static (Two Sensor Products)
        3. 3.2.1.3 Co-Located Bi-Static (Single Sensor Product, Dual IWR6843)
        4. 3.2.1.4 Mono-Static (Single Sensor Product, Single IWR6843)
        5. 3.2.1.5 Summary
      2. 3.2.2 Latent Fault Monitoring
    3. 3.3 Sensor Level Architecture
      1. 3.3.1 Sensor Level Architecture for CAT 2
      2. 3.3.2 Sensor Level Architecture for Cat 3
  7. 4IEC TS 61496-5 Functional Test Results
  8. 5Other Considerations
    1. 5.1 Vibrations
    2. 5.2 Clock
  9. 6Conclusion
  10. 7References

3.2.1.2 Co-Located Bi-Static (Two Sensor Products)

Two radar sensors are placed in the same physical location, creating overlapping fields of view. It reduces the installation cost since both sensors are mounted together. But the hardware costs are still higher compared to mono-static configurations.

Co-Located Bi-Static Setup (Two Sensor Products) Figure 3-8 Co-Located Bi-Static Setup (Two Sensor Products)

Environmental factors with a coupling effect, such as mechanical vibrations in the supporting structure add new dependent fault injectors (DFI). A mitigation strategy could be to use signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements or onboard vibration sensors to detect and manage faults caused by vibrations.
OSZAR »